J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2023 Jun 21:S1525-8610(23)00474-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2023.05.010. Online ahead of print.
ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of oral anticoagulants for older adult patients with atrial fibrillation (AF).
DESIGN: Pairwise and network meta-analyses.
SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: Patients with AF aged ≥75 years.
METHODS: PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane library were searched for published randomized controlled trials and adjusted observational studies evaluating the use of a non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs), vitamin K antagonist, or antiplatelet drug for the prevention of stroke. The primary efficacy and safety outcomes were the composite of stroke and systemic embolism (SSE) and major bleedings.
RESULTS: This study included 38 studies enrolling 1,022,908 older adult patients with AF. Results from pairwise meta-analyses showed that NOACs were superior to warfarin for all outcomes, except that dabigatran increased the risk of gastrointestinal (GI) bleedings. Aspirin was associated with a higher risk of SSE and ischemic stroke than warfarin or NOACs. Results of network meta-analyses indicated that apixaban significantly reduced the risk of SSE, major bleedings, and GI bleedings than warfarin, rivaroxaban, and dabigatran. Apixaban, edoxaban, rivaroxaban, and dabigatran reduced the risk of ischemic stroke and intracranial bleeding compared to warfarin. Dabigatran showed lower risk of all-cause mortality than warfarin and of intracranial bleeding than rivaroxaban.
CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: NOACs are of at least equal efficacy, or even superior to warfarin. The safety profile of individual NOAC agents was significantly different, as apixaban performs better than the other oral anticoagulants in reducing major bleeding and GI bleeding, whereas dabigatran increased the risk of GI bleeding.
PMID:37355246 | DOI:10.1016/j.jamda.2023.05.010