Diagnostic accuracy of computed tomography pulmonary angiography with reduced radiation and contrast material dose: a prospective randomized clinical trial.
Invest Radiol. 2014 Apr;49(4):201-8
Authors: Szucs-Farkas Z, Christe A, Megyeri B, Rohacek M, Vock P, Nagy EV, Heverhagen JT, Schindera ST
OBJECTIVE: The objective of the study was to test the diagnostic performance of low-dose computed tomography pulmonary angiography (CTPA) at peak tube voltage of 80 kVp with both reduced radiation and reduced contrast material (CM) dose.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this single-center, single-blinded prospective randomized trial, 501 patients with body weights of less than 100 kg with suspected acute pulmonary embolism (PE) were assigned to normal-dose CTPA (100-kVp tube energy and 100-mL CM, 255 patients) and low-dose CTPA (80-kVp tube energy and 75-mL CM, 246 patients). Primary end points were evidence of PE in CTPA and accuracy of CTPA on a composite reference standard. Results were compared by calculating the odds ratio with the 95% confidence interval.
RESULTS: The reference diagnosis was equivocal in 20 of the 501 patients. Diagnosis of CTPA was correct in 240 patients and incorrect in 5 in the normal-dose group. Computed tomography pulmonary angiography was correct in 230 patients and incorrect in 6 in the low-dose group (odds ratio, 1.25; 95% confidence interval, 0.38-4.16; P = 0.77). Sensitivity was 96.9% and 100% and specificity was 98.1% and 97.1% in the normal-dose and low-dose groups, respectively. No PE or PE-related death occurred during the 90-day follow-up. The size-specific dose estimates were 30% lower at 80 kVp (4.8 ± 1.0 mGy) compared with that at 100 kVp (6.8 ± 1.2 mGy; P < 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: The accuracy of low-dose CTPA at 80 kVp with a 30% reduced radiation dose and a 25% lower CM volume is not significantly different from that of normal-dose CTPA at 100 kVp in detecting acute PE in patients weighing less than 100 kg.
PMID: 24473367 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]