Intravenous magnesium in the management of rapid atrial fibrillation: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Link to article at PubMed

J Cardiol. 2021 Jun 20:S0914-5087(21)00151-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jjcc.2021.06.001. Online ahead of print.


BACKGROUND: The aim of this meta-analysis is to investigate the effectiveness of intravenous magnesium (IV Mg2+) in rate and rhythm control of rapid atrial fibrillation (AF) when administered in addition to standard-of-care for non-post-operative patients. Previous meta-analyses on this topic have demonstrated the efficacy of IV Mg2+ in achieving rate control, but not rhythm control.

METHODS: Six randomized controlled trials comparing IV Mg2+ to placebo in the treatment of rapid AF were obtained from electronic databases totaling 745 patients. Outcomes were analyzed using a Mantel-Haenszel random-effects model and expressed as odds ratios (OR) for dichotomous outcomes with their 95% confidence intervals (CIs).

RESULTS: Our pooled analysis showed that IV Mg2+ given in addition to standard-of-care was superior in achieving rate control (63% vs 40%; OR 2.49, 95% CI 1.80-3.45) and rhythm conversion to sinus (21% vs. 14%, OR 1.75, 95% CI 1.08-2.84) compared to standard-of-care alone. Flushing was more frequently observed in patients receiving IV Mg2+ compared to placebo (9% vs. 0.4%, OR 19.79, 95% CI 4.30-91.21). Subgroup analysis showed the superiority of a lower dose of IV Mg2+, which we designated as 5 g or lower (24% vs 13%, OR 2.10, 95% CI 1.22-3.61) compared to the higher dose (>5 g) (16% vs 13%, OR 1.23, 95% CI 0.65-2.32) in rhythm control when compared to placebo.

CONCLUSIONS: IV Mg2+ administered in conjunction with standard-of-care is effective for rate control and modestly effective for restoration of sinus rhythm in rapid AF without clinically significant adverse effects.

PMID:34162502 | DOI:10.1016/j.jjcc.2021.06.001

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.