Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2021 Feb 28:S1553-7250(21)00037-4. doi: 10.1016/j.jcjq.2021.02.008. Online ahead of print.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: There is no known method for determining the minimum number of beds in hospital inpatient units (IPs) to achieve patient waiting-time targets. This study aims to determine the relationship between patient waiting time-related performance measures and bed utilization, so as to optimize IP capacity decisions.
METHODS: The researchers simulated a novel queueing model specifically developed for the IPs. The model takes into account salient features of patient-flow dynamics and was validated against hospital census data. The team used the model to evaluate inpatient capacity decisions against multiple waiting time outcomes: (1) daily average, peak-hour average, and daily maximum waiting times; and (2) proportion of patients waiting strictly more than 0, 1, and 2 hours. The results were published in a simple Microsoft Excel toolbox to allow administrators to conduct sensitivity analysis.
RESULTS: To achieve the hospital's goal of rooming patients within 30 to 60 minutes of IP bed requests, the model predicted that the optimal daily average occupancy levels should be 89%-92% (182-188 beds) in the Medicine cohort, 74%-79% (41-43 beds) in the Cardiology cohort, and 72%-78% (23-25 beds) in the Observation cohort. Larger IP cohorts can achieve the same queueing-related performance measure as smaller ones, while tolerating a higher occupancy level. Moreover, patient waiting time increases rapidly as the occupancy level approaches 100%.
CONCLUSION: No universal optimal IP occupancy level exists. Capacity decisions should therefore be made on a cohort-by-cohort basis, incorporating the comprehensive patient-flow characteristics of each cohort. To this end, patient-flow queueing models tailored to the IPs are needed.
PMID:33785263 | DOI:10.1016/j.jcjq.2021.02.008