Int J Clin Pract. 2020 Dec 26:e13972. doi: 10.1111/ijcp.13972. Online ahead of print.
BACKGROUND: Acute kidney injuries are common in the medical intensive care unit. Generally, intravenous normal saline is administered in critically ill patients but it is associated with acute kidney injury. Current knowledge of chloride and its effect on the physiological functions of the kidney is limited. The objectives of the study were to compare the safety of chloride-restrictive intravenous fluid administration against that of chloride-liberal regarding acute kidney injuries.
METHODS: Data regarding RIFLE (risk, injury, failure, loss, and end-stage renal failure) categories, Kidney Disease: Improved Global Outcomes (KDIGO) stage, Δ creatinine, and requirements of renal replacement therapy of 285 patients admitted to medical intensive care unit for critical illness during 4-months from the hospitalisation were retrospectively collected and analysed. Patients received chloride-liberal intravenous fluid (CL cohort, n = 163) or that of chloride-restrictive (CR cohort, n = 122) during bundle-of-care.
RESULTS: Patients with risk (P = .039) and injury (P = .041) categories of RIFLE, high Δ creatinine (0.22 ± 0.02 mg/dL/patient vs 0.18 ± 0.02 mg/dL/patient, P < .0001), and patients with KDIGO stage 1 (P = .023) and stage 2 (P = .048) were reported significantly higher in the CL cohort than the CR cohort. The higher numbers of patients were put on renal replacement therapy in the CL cohort than those of the CR cohort (16 vs 3, P = .014).
CONCLUSION: The chloride-restrictive intravenous fluid administration has reduced the chances of acute kidney injuries in the intensive medical care unit.