Transfusion. 2020 Aug 5. doi: 10.1111/trf.15954. Online ahead of print.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: The PLASMIC score was developed to identify patients with thrombotic microangiopathy who are most likely to have immune thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (TTP) and benefit from therapeutic plasma exchange (TPE). PLASMIC scores of 0-4, 5, and 6-7 are said to correspond to low, intermediate, and high probability of TTP, respectively.
STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis on the diagnostic accuracy of the PLASMIC score in adults with suspected TTP. We evaluated the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value (NPV) of PLASMIC score thresholds of ≥5 and ≥6. Study quality was appraised using the QUADAS-2 tool.
RESULTS: We identified 13 eligible studies, which collectively enrolled 970 patients. The median prevalence of TTP among eligible studies was 35%. The sensitivity and specificity of a PLASMIC score ≥5 was 0.99 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.91-1.00) and 0.57 (95% CI, 0.41-0.72), respectively. At a prevalence of 35%, the NPV of a PLASMIC score ≥5 was 0.99 (95% CI, 0.92-1.00). A PLASMIC score ≥6 was associated with a sensitivity and specificity of 0.85 (95% CI, 0.67-0.94) and 0.89 (95% CI, 0.81-0.94), respectively. The NPV of a PLASMIC score ≥6 at a prevalence of 35% was 0.92 (95% CI, 0.82-0.97).
CONCLUSION: A PLASMIC score threshold of ≥5 is associated with high sensitivity and NPV and may be a useful screening tool for identifying patients who are unlikely to have TTP and do not require TPE, though prospective assessment is required. A PLASMIC score <6 appears to have insufficient sensitivity to rule out TTP and the need for TPE.
PMID:32757237 | DOI:10.1111/trf.15954