Antithrombotic Approaches in Acute Coronary Syndromes: Optimizing Benefit vs Bleeding Risks.

Link to article at PubMed

Related Articles

Antithrombotic Approaches in Acute Coronary Syndromes: Optimizing Benefit vs Bleeding Risks.

Mayo Clin Proc. 2016 Oct;91(10):1413-1447

Authors: Singh M, Bhatt DL, Stone GW, Rihal CS, Gersh BJ, Lennon RJ, Narula J, Fuster V

Abstract
It is estimated that in the United States, each year, approximately 620,000 persons will experience an acute coronary syndrome and approximately 70% of these will have non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome. Cardiovascular disease still accounts for 1 of every 3 deaths in the United States, and there is an urgent need to improve the prognosis of patients presenting with acute coronary syndrome. Cardiovascular mortality and ischemic complications are common after acute coronary syndrome, and the advent of newer antithrombotic therapies has reduced ischemic complications, but at the expense of greater bleeding. The new antithrombotic agents also raise the challenge of choosing between multiple potential therapeutic combinations to minimize recurrent ischemia without a concomitant increase in bleeding, a decision that often varies according to an individual patient's relative propensity for ischemia versus hemorrhage. In this review, we will synthesize the available information to arm health care providers with the contemporary knowledge on antithrombotic therapy and individualize treatment decisions.

PMID: 27712639 [PubMed - in process]

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *