Has there been any progress in improving the quality of hospitalised death? Replication of a US chart audit study.
BMJ Support Palliat Care. 2012 Mar;2(1):17-23
Authors: Parikh P, Brokaw FC, Saggar S, Graves L, Balan S, Li Z, Tosteson TD, Bakitas M
OBJECTIVE: To describe the experience of dying in a US tertiary academic medical centre and to compare this experience with a historical decedent sample.
DESIGN: A retrospective, observational, chart audit study of adults (N=159) who died in hospital.
SETTING: Component hospitals of the Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center: Mary Hitchcock Memorial Hospital (MHMH), Lebanon, New Hampshire, and the affiliated Veteran's Affairs Medical Center (VAMC), White River Junction, Vermont.
PARTICIPANTS: 159 hospitalised adult decedents comprising a random sample of 100 MHMH decedents and a total sample of 59 VAMC decedents.
METHODS: The authors compared end-of-life (EOL) care in decedents who had a palliative care consultation (PCC) with those who did not. An exploratory analysis compared the EOL care between the 2008 decedent sample and an historical decedent sample (N=104).
RESULTS: 63 of 159 inpatients received a PCC. Decedents receiving a PCC were less likely to die in an intensive care unit, had fewer invasive interventions (eg, intubation, assisted ventilation, dialysis, chemotherapy) and were more likely to have advance directives, do-not-resuscitate orders and comfort measures orders than those who did not receive a PCC. Higher rates of emotional and pastoral care were also noted. Compared with the historical sample, 2008 decedents had a higher rate of invasive interventions, but fewer invasive interventions were noted in the 2008 PCC subsample.
CONCLUSIONS: Less invasive EOL care was observed in decedents who received a PCC. Ongoing monitoring of EOL care is critically important for hospital quality improvement programmes.
PMID: 24653494 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]