Hospitalization and Survival in Patients Utilizing Epoprostenol for Injection in the PROSPECT Observational Study.

Link to article at PubMed

Related Articles

Hospitalization and Survival in Patients Utilizing Epoprostenol for Injection in the PROSPECT Observational Study.

Chest. 2014 Oct 9;

Authors: Frantz RP, Schilz RJ, Chakinala MM, Badesch DB, Frost AE, McLaughlin VV, Barst RJ, Rosenberg DM, Miller DP, Hartline BK, Benton WW, Farber HW

Abstract
Abstract: Background:Few studies have prospectively reported outcomes in pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) patients treated with epoprostenol in the modern-day era of oral therapy and combination treatments. The Registry to PROSPECTively Describe Use of Epoprostenol for Injection [Veletri, prolonged Room Temperature Stable Epoprostenol (RTS-Epo)] in Patients with Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension (PROSPECT) was established to prospectively describe the course of PAH in patients prescribed RTS-Epo. Methods:PROSPECT is a multicenter, US-based drug registry of primarily Group I PAH patients treated with RTS-Epo who were parenteral-naïve or parenteral-transitioned at enrollment. Patients were followed until discontinuation of RTS-Epo, withdrawal, loss to follow-up, death, or end of study (maximum 1 year). One-year freedom from hospitalization (FH) and survival estimates were summarized by prostacyclin history (parenteral-naïve or parenteral-transitioned), gender, and chronic renal insufficiency (CRI). Results:A total of 336 patients were included. The overall one-year FH estimate was 51.0% ±2.8% and was lower in parenteral-naive patients than parenteral-transitioned patients (42.8% ±4.3% vs. 57.1% ±3.7%, respectively; p=0.002). FH estimates were lower in male patients than female patients (38.3% ±5.9% vs. 54.6% ±3.2%, respectively; p<0.015) and in patients with CRI than patients without CRI (17.0% ±8.4% vs. 53.7% ±2.9%, respectively; p<0.001). The overall one-year survival estimate was 84.0% ±2.1%. Survival was poorer in parenteral-naive patients, male patients, and patients with CRI. Conclusions:Risk of hospitalization and mortality remain high in PAH patients. In particular, patients who are parenteral-naïve at initiation of RTS-Epo therapy, male patients, and patients with CRI require close monitoring and aggressive clinical management.
Background: Few studies have prospectively reported outcomes in pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) patients treated with epoprostenol in the modern-day era of oral therapy and combination treatments. The Registry to PROSPECTively Describe Use of Epoprostenol for Injection [Veletri, prolonged Room Temperature Stable Epoprostenol (RTS-Epo)] in Patients with Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension (PROSPECT) was established to prospectively describe the course of PAH in patients prescribed RTS-Epo.
Methods: PROSPECT is a multicenter, US-based drug registry of primarily Group I PAH patients treated with RTS-Epo who were parenteral-naïve or parenteral-transitioned at enrollment. Patients were followed until discontinuation of RTS-Epo, withdrawal, loss to follow-up, death, or end of study (maximum 1 year). One-year freedom from hospitalization (FH) and survival estimates were summarized by prostacyclin history (parenteral-naïve or parenteral-transitioned), gender, and chronic renal insufficiency (CRI).
Results: A total of 336 patients were included. The overall one-year FH estimate was 51.0% ±2.8% and was lower in parenteral-naive patients than parenteral-transitioned patients (42.8% ±4.3% vs. 57.1% ±3.7%, respectively; p=0.002). FH estimates were lower in male patients than female patients (38.3% ±5.9% vs. 54.6% ±3.2%, respectively; p<0.015) and in patients with CRI than patients without CRI (17.0% ±8.4% vs. 53.7% ±2.9%, respectively; p<0.001). The overall one-year survival estimate was 84.0% ±2.1%. Survival was poorer in parenteral-naive patients, male patients, and patients with CRI.
Conclusions: Risk of hospitalization and mortality remain high in PAH patients. In particular, patients who are parenteral-naïve at initiation of RTS-Epo therapy, male patients, and patients with CRI require close monitoring and aggressive clinical management.

PMID: 25320967 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher]

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *