| Related Articles |
Contrast medium-induced nephrotoxicity risk assessment in adult inpatients: a comparison of serum creatinine level- and estimated glomerular filtration rate-based screening methods.
Radiology. 2013 Oct;269(1):92-100
Authors: Davenport MS, Khalatbari S, Cohan RH, Ellis JH
Abstract
PURPOSE: To compare serum creatinine (SCr) level- and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR)-based screening methods for identifying adult inpatients at risk for contrast medium-induced nephrotoxicity (CIN).
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Institutional review board approval was obtained; informed consent was waived for this HIPAA-compliant retrospective study. Computed tomographic examinations performed during 10 years in adult inpatients with stable renal function were identified (n = 28 390). The proportion of inpatients meeting various eGFR (≥60, <60, <45, <30, 30-44, 45-59 mL/min/1.73 m(2)) and SCr (<1.5, ≥1.5, ≥1.6, ≥1.7, ≥1.8, ≥1.9, ≥2.0 mg/dL) thresholds were contrasted with each other and with published guidelines (≥2.0 mg/dL [SCr] and <45 mL/min/1.73 m(2) [eGFR]) using McNemar and binomial tests.
RESULTS: Most inpatients were considered low risk for CIN with commonly used thresholds: 92.6% (26 285 of 28 390) had SCr <1.5 mg/dL; 91.3% (25 922 of 28 390) had eGFR of ≥45 mL/min/1.73 m(2). Using SCr threshold of ≥1.5 mg/dL, identified inpatients had the following eGFRs: 19.6% (413 of 2105), 45-59 mL/min/1.73 m(2); 51.1% (1075 of 2105), 30-44 mL/min/1.73 m(2); 28.6% (603 of 2105), <30 mL/min/1.73 m(2); and 0.7% (14 of 2105), ≥60 mL/min/1.73 m(2) . Using SCr threshold of ≥2.0 mg/dL, identified inpatients had the following eGFRs: 100% (658 of 658), <45 mL/min/1.73 m(2); 74.6% (491 of 658), <30 mL/min/1.73 m(2). Threshold of SCr ≥2.0 mg/dL could not be used to identify eGFR <30 mL/min/1.73 m(2) in 0.4% (112 of 28 390) and <45 mL/min/1.73 m(2) in 6.4% (1810 of 28 390) of all inpatients. Using eGFR <45 mL/min/1.73 m(2) instead of SCr of ≥1.5 mg/dL would result in a significant but small increase in identified inpatients (8.7% [2468 of 28 390; 95% confidence interval: 8.4%, 9.0%] vs 7.4% [2105 of 28 390; 95% confidence interval: 7.1%, 7.7%]; P < .0001).
CONCLUSION: Screening using eGFR <45 mL/min/1.73 m(2) instead of common SCr thresholds would significantly increase the number of inpatients identified to be at risk for CIN but would reduce misidentification of a large number of inpatients at low risk according to eGFR criteria.
PMID: 23579047 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]