Return on investment for vendor computerized physician order entry in four community hospitals: the importance of decision support.

Link to article at PubMed

Related Articles

Return on investment for vendor computerized physician order entry in four community hospitals: the importance of decision support.

Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2013 Jul;39(7):312-8

Authors: Zimlichman E, Keohane C, Franz C, Everett WL, Seger DL, Yoon C, Leung AA, Cadet B, Coffey M, Kaufman NE, Bates DW

Abstract
BACKGROUND: In-hospital adverse events are a major cause of morbidity and mortality and represent a major cost burden to health care systems. A study was conducted to evaluate the return on investment (ROI) for the adoption of vendor-developed computerized physician oder entry (CPOE) systems in four community hospitals in Massachusetts.
METHODS: Of the four hospitals, two were under one management structure and implemented the same vendor-developed CPOE system (Hospital Group A), while the other two were under a second management structure and implemented another vendor-developed CPOE system (Hospital Group B). Cost savings were calculated on the basis of reduction in preventable adverse drug event (ADE) rates as measured previously. ROI, net cash flow, and the breakeven point during a 10-year cost-and-benefit model were calculated. At the time of the study, none of the participating hospitals had implemented more than a rudimentary decision support system together with CPOE.
RESULTS: Implementation costs were lower for Hospital Group A than B ($7,130,894 total or $83/admission versus $19,293,379 total or $113/admission, respectively), as were preventable ADE-related avoided costs ($7,937,651 and $16,557,056, respectively). A cost-benefit analysis demonstrated that Hospital Group A had an ROI of 11.3%, breaking even on the investment eight years following implementation. Hospital Group B showed a negative return, with an ROI of -3.1%.
CONCLUSIONS: Adoption of vendor CPOE systems in community hospitals was associated with a modest ROI at best when applying cost savings attributable to prevention of ADEs only. The modest financial returns can beattributed to the lack of clinical decision support tools.

PMID: 23888641 [PubMed - in process]

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.