Patient Perceptions of Computed Tomographic Imaging and Their Understanding of Radiation Risk and Exposure.

Link to article at PubMed

Patient Perceptions of Computed Tomographic Imaging and Their Understanding of Radiation Risk and Exposure.

Ann Emerg Med. 2010 Dec 10;

Authors: Baumann BM, Chen EH, Mills AM, Glaspey L, Thompson NM, Jones MK, Farner MC

STUDY OBJECTIVE:: We describe patient perceptions of computed tomography (CT) and their understanding of radiation exposure and risk. METHODS:: This was a cross-sectional study of acute abdominal pain patients aged 18 years or older. Confidence in medical evaluations with increasing levels of laboratory testing and imaging was rated on a 100-point visual analog scale. Knowledge of radiation exposure was ascertained when participants compared the radiation dose of one abdomen-pelvis CT with 2-view chest radiography. To assess cancer risk knowledge, participants rated their agreement with these factual statements: "Approximately 2 to 3 abdominal CTs give the same radiation exposure as experienced by Hiroshima survivors" and "2 to 3 abdominal CTs over a person's lifetime can increase cancer risk." Previous CT was also assessed. RESULTS:: There were 1,168 participants, 67% women and mean age 40.7 years (SD 15.9 years). Median confidence in a medical evaluation without ancillary testing was 20 (95% confidence interval [CI] 16 to 25) compared with 90 (95% CI 88 to 91) when laboratory testing and CT were included. More than 70% of participants underestimated the radiation dose of CT relative to chest radiography, and cancer risk comprehension was poor. Median agreement with the Hiroshima statement was 13 (95% CI 10 to 16) and 45 (95% CI 40 to 45) with the increased lifetime cancer risk statement. Seven hundred ninety-five patients reported receiving a previous CT. Of 365 patients who reported no previous CT, 142 (39%) had one documented in our electronic medical record. CONCLUSION:: Patients are more confident when CT imaging is part of their medical evaluation but have a poor understanding of the concomitant radiation exposure and risk and underestimate their previous imaging experience.

PMID: 21146900 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher]

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *