CONTROVERSIES IN INTERNAL MEDICINE: A Hospitalist Inpatient System Does Not Improve Patient Care Outcomes

Link to article at PubMed

Shared by Robert Mahoney Link:
INTRODUCTION What is a hospitalist inpatient system? How do we define improving patient care outcomes (PCOs)? To what alternative are we comparing a hospitalist inpatient system? We have been asked to debate a proposition that raises many questions. I submit that per se a hospitalist inpatient system does not improve PCOs. I will base my argument on several major points. DEFINING HOSPITALIST SYSTEMS First, hospitalist "systems" vary greatly among hospitals. We cannot evaluate hospitalist systems generically because of their great variation. Second, we must look at all outcomes. We cannot focus just on hospital outcomes; we must include long-term outcomes. The hospitalist model might have positive or negative effects on trust and satisfaction. Third, we must consider the relative importance of physician factors and system factors. We must include continuity factors—both in the hospital and across settings. The first explicit discussion of the job description hospitalist came in the classic . . .

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *